🔗 Share this article

Thhese times showcase a very unusual phenomenon: the first-ever US march of the caretakers. Their attributes range in their expertise and characteristics, but they all share the identical goal – to avert an Israeli breach, or even demolition, of the delicate truce. After the war finished, there have been rare days without at least one of Donald Trump’s envoys on the territory. Only in the last few days saw the arrival of a senior advisor, a businessman, a senator and Marco Rubio – all arriving to perform their roles.

Israel engages them fully. In just a few days it launched a series of strikes in Gaza after the deaths of a pair of Israeli military soldiers – resulting, as reported, in scores of Palestinian injuries. Multiple ministers called for a restart of the conflict, and the Knesset approved a initial measure to annex the West Bank. The US response was somewhere between “no” and “hell no.”

But in several ways, the Trump administration seems more concentrated on preserving the existing, uneasy phase of the peace than on advancing to the following: the rehabilitation of the Gaza Strip. Regarding that, it appears the United States may have aspirations but little specific strategies.

Currently, it remains unknown at what point the proposed international governing body will truly assume control, and the same goes for the proposed security force – or even the identity of its personnel. On a recent day, Vance stated the United States would not force the composition of the foreign contingent on the Israeli government. But if the prime minister's administration keeps to reject multiple options – as it acted with the Ankara's suggestion recently – what happens then? There is also the opposite point: which party will decide whether the forces preferred by Israel are even prepared in the mission?

The matter of the duration it will take to disarm Hamas is just as ambiguous. “The expectation in the administration is that the multinational troops is intends to now take charge in neutralizing Hamas,” said Vance this week. “That’s going to take a while.” Trump only reinforced the lack of clarity, saying in an conversation recently that there is no “fixed” timeline for Hamas to lay down arms. So, hypothetically, the unnamed elements of this yet-to-be-formed international force could enter Gaza while the organization's fighters still remain in control. Would they be facing a leadership or a insurgent group? These represent only some of the concerns surfacing. Some might ask what the verdict will be for ordinary residents as things stand, with the group continuing to focus on its own adversaries and critics.

Current developments have once again underscored the gaps of Israeli journalism on each side of the Gazan border. Every source attempts to scrutinize every possible perspective of Hamas’s violations of the peace. And, typically, the fact that the organization has been delaying the return of the remains of killed Israeli hostages has taken over the news.

On the other hand, attention of non-combatant casualties in Gaza caused by Israeli strikes has obtained little focus – or none. Consider the Israeli counter attacks after a recent southern Gaza event, in which two troops were fatally wounded. While Gaza’s authorities stated 44 fatalities, Israeli news commentators questioned the “moderate response,” which hit only infrastructure.

That is nothing new. During the past weekend, the press agency charged Israeli forces of breaking the ceasefire with Hamas 47 occasions since the ceasefire came into effect, resulting in the loss of dozens of Palestinians and wounding another many more. The claim appeared unimportant to most Israeli reporting – it was just absent. This applied to reports that 11 individuals of a local family were lost their lives by Israeli forces last Friday.

Gaza’s emergency services said the group had been attempting to return to their dwelling in the Zeitoun area of the city when the bus they were in was targeted for reportedly crossing the “yellow line” that marks zones under Israeli military command. That yellow line is not visible to the naked eye and appears only on plans and in government records – not always obtainable to ordinary people in the area.

Yet this occurrence barely rated a note in Israeli media. One source covered it shortly on its digital site, quoting an Israeli military representative who stated that after a suspect vehicle was detected, forces fired alerting fire towards it, “but the transport persisted to move toward the troops in a fashion that posed an imminent danger to them. The troops shot to remove the threat, in accordance with the agreement.” Zero casualties were stated.

Given such perspective, it is little wonder numerous Israeli citizens feel Hamas solely is to responsible for breaking the peace. This belief threatens encouraging appeals for a more aggressive approach in Gaza.

Sooner or later – perhaps sooner than expected – it will not be sufficient for US envoys to take on the role of caretakers, telling the Israeli government what to avoid. They will {have to|need